Work WITH the trend; not AGAINST it

Now this is an interesting article in which nearly every student or professor can relate. Some may say cell phones are becoming a major issue, especially in schools, whereas others that believe cell phones are a part of technology choose to work with the trend; not against it. I definitely agree.

Many professors complain about the lack of attention students have in class due to the distraction of their cell phones. I don't disagree with that; however, it seems somewhat necessary these days to have a cell phone. What if there is an emergency at home? What if there is an attack on campus and the faculty needs to alert the students? Many people do not check their email every 30 minutes, therefore, it is essential that professors and faculty have an alternative way of contacting their students.

A professor in the article discussed how she has overcome the cell phone obstacle. She has incorporated parts of her lesson with technology. They have announcements sent over text and also hold class discussions using their cell phones. Not only does this break down the barrier students have against their teachers, but it allows them to learn through a different medium in which they are most familiar.

As an ambassador at the college, we are in charge of contacting a number of prospective students in a variety of ways: email, post cards, phone calls, and the newest medium--text messaging. Why? Because students USE their cell phones.

It was just today when a faculty member came into our office complaining about the DSC Banner system. The system contains invalid information, and it is nearly impossible to contact students when their cell phone number is not in Banner. How does anyone expect to conctact someone when they don't know their cell phone number?

So, although cell phones may be a distraction, there is no way to ban them. Cell phones are a part of the technological age we live in, and they should be used to their full capacity--even in the classroom. Again, work with the trend; not against it.

http://www.sltrib.com/ci_10528130